If any creditor or third party comes to court

[mahbubamim077]

Not satisfied with the judicial rejection of its claim, GNC then filed a new lawsuit. It verified the accounts in its own books and, finding a balance greater than the outstanding debt, filed a new bankruptcy petition, which was denied because the creditor did not include the documents proving the veracity of the entries in the accounts extracted from its books, and because it did not characterize the debtor's default with the protest of the lack of payment of the account thus verified.

The negative judgment then results in the abusive, imprudent bulk sms portugal and capricious procedure of the creditor. Having no clear and certain debt title due, he used a credit check in his own books to claim the opening of bankruptcy, and, without the indispensable caution of presenting proof of the entries, and without the establishment of the debtor in default by protest, he filed for bankruptcy again.

The case is of the nature of that recalled by BONELLI, and in his view typical of the claimant's responsibility:


Having declined the request, he reissued it, in a tumultuous process, which resulted in the declaration of bankruptcy without a hearing of the debtor, who was caught on a Sunday by the court officer, then imprisoned, for having protested against the illegal citation, and then his defense was withdrawn from the process, on the grounds of lateness, a ground that was unfounded, because this was recognized by the Court, in a decision that made res judicata, when annulling the bankruptcy decree.

The consultant was dragged, abusively, maliciously, recklessly and fraudulently by the same creditor into three bankruptcy proceedings.

The fact is abusive, it gives rise to the duty to compensate, and so we have no doubt that it can be recognized.