How to Personalize Landing Pages for Different Audience Segments

[shishir.seoexpert1]

They are thus the problems, conceptual, terribly unfilmable. The complete opposite of a judicial enclosure, with its characters and its history, its reversals, its verdicts (the word has also passed into common language to translate the importance of decisive moments). "Security" is this all-encompassing problem. It has no story with a beginning, middle and end. No hero whose face would give any clue. Of course, it knows various episodes, as many categories of trials as terrorism, delinquency, "sensitive" neighborhoods... It has a host of faces, specialists, victims, politicians, decision-makers... Moreover its definition is in itself a challenge. There is the famous feeling of "insecurity", the dramatic and very concrete experience of those who have suffered, the discourse of the sociologist who measures, of the head of public power who says...

In this far from harmonious concert, statistics gambling data cambodia alone seem to be in line with the problem that is being deployed, unfolded, stretched. As much as security cannot be filmed – only its consequences are accessible to the image – it is quantified . Endlessly. The criteria go in all directions, space, domain, time. And justice in all this? It seems to have merged into this security problem . Recidivism, prison, penalty, the law – is it itself applicable or not, lax or not? -, all this now belongs to security, to its debate, and to its controversies of all kinds. Confrontation is often more common, and almost more important than the facts themselves. It often happens that we skip the box of "what happened?" for that of "what should we do?" Meanwhile, almost like two roads crossing, trials have been filmed, the constitution of the archives of justice has continued at the pace of hearings held around crimes against humanity, or terrorist acts. And "for the best reasons in the world" these images are protected from the public eye...

Recovering the lost image of justice



Terrible paradox, at a time when the world is experiencing a global society of the image . Certainly, the great trial (which is already in itself, a selection) is recorded, but it is placed in the shadow of documentary reserves. While the planet has its eyes wide open on the screens of real time. Live, the shots of social networks take the living and the dead. Promotion, lamentation, mobilization, all of us, we are subjected to the surge of emotion. The video becoming an element of evidence in real time for a trial that instantly begins . Power of the capture broadcast en masse by pocket screens, in the moment. We are facing a real political disruption for lovers of modern language. Hence the imperative requirement of a culture of critical thinking. Precisely, not to let ourselves be carried away by the " instant verdict ".