The following description of my perception of the SRG is therefore more personal, that of a consumer, rather than that of the president of the party that is said to have a traditional closeness to the SRG. And to say it straight away: personally, I don't think the SRG is making a particularly good impression at the moment. Why?
In recent years, the SRG has adopted japan rcs data a vice that can be seen in some state-owned companies: it presents itself as entrepreneurial in its jargon, in the salaries of its executives and in the expansion of its services at the expense of private media and publishing companies.
This is where the private sector arguments prevail: the salaries of the executives must be high enough to attract "the best on the market".
Apart from the fact that this argument is also incorrect in the private sector, it must be noted that there at least the owner decides on salaries. The SRG further argues that the expansion of advertising opportunities, the expansion on the Internet (with its own journalistic formats and corresponding staff), the advertising alliance with Ringier and Swisscom: all of this is necessary because it has to assert itself in a "highly competitive market" because "foreign competition" (above all: "Google and Facebook") dominates the advertising market.