The reader who wants to express himself publicly and knows that the homemade blog will only have a modest audience is given the opportunity to use a loudspeaker, a multiplier, for free. In reality, he should pay for this, as for any service. But that is not the case, with a few exceptions. Not to mention the lack of protection for poland rcs data the author of articles commented on in this way. Anyone who, like me, has already been through a few shitstorms knows what he is talking about.
The icing on the cake is that even reputable media platforms, after occasional resistance, are prepared to delete a comment that is clearly defamatory and that "unfortunately" slipped through the coarse-meshed filters. But they do not, for example, reveal the IP address of the offender, citing data protection.
In summary, it can be said that many press organs are making themselves redundant in one fell swoop. through covert advertising such as "branded content" or "native advertising". By reducing editorial departments to "relief boxes" (Imhof be thanked for this term), they are losing competence and relevance. By using "reader reporters" they are reducing the once respected craft of a reporter to absurdity. And by using the comment column on the Internet they have opened the toilet door wide open, allowing anyone to watch their contemporaries relieve themselves in public.
.