Page 1 of 1

In the case of presenation meetings

Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 6:10 am
by Bappy11
they are more suited to the context of a team that is too large. Indeed, regardless of the number of participants, its effectiveness and duration are not impacted. We can also find this type of meeting in the form of a briefing where a referent has downward communication. In complex and chaotic fields (such as IT development), collaboration is closely linked to performance. If this form of meeting is too large, the team will have more difficulty solving problems , will react less quickly to changes and will have difficulty obtaining the involvement of all members .

As for sharing meetings , we can notice that they leave little room for participants to really exchange. In a problematic team, the Daily Scrum turns into a report where participants mechanically list the elements to share and are restricted in their exchanges so that it does not last too long. But also, the attention of the participants quickly slackens and the interest of these meetings is sweden telegram data therefore lost . If we count 2 minutes per speech, we will notice that the time spent in this type of meeting is quickly high.

And finally, let's talk about the worst, collaboration meetings. Scrum Masters who have supervised a Sprint Retrospective with more than 10 participants will tell you: it's difficult to be efficient and keep to the timebox . The same goes for work sessions, Refinement sessions or Sprint Planning sessions. As soon as collaboration is necessary, discussing and debating with more than 10 people is difficult and very time-consuming .