system, permission system,
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2024 9:59 am
If you can't pass it, you may not die, but you have to endure it. What is an end product manager? What is the difference between an end product manager and an end product manager? The end product manager means i business. The end product manager must first understand the importance of this position and design a product solution that is more suitable for the needs of this project. In the end, the product manager... View details> The first tribulation: Can the intelligence level jump again? Isn't it available after looking at various test results? Didn't it crush humans a long time ago? Why is intelligence still not enough? This question can only be answered by returning to the perspective of Steve Jobs: looking back at technology from the user's perspective rather than looking at how the technology can be used.
This user perspective can also be simplified: replacing japan cell number people and past programs is the most intuitive value of I, and every user needs it. The first step to replace people is to consider which roles can be covered. The main progress now is to make excellent people even better and replace other people. (i) A further step is to completely replace a certain role I and operate independently without human intervention. (i) Taking a company as an example, it is roughly like this: The first step to replace the program is to schedule other software products like that with the role of people as the center.
The second step is to fold out the redundant I, account current product. If you think this is difficult to understand, you can imagine how many parts of the system are actually repeated because of the artificial division caused by different suppliers and different roles. You must know that these divisions are just because the division of labor is like this, which is a compromise with reality, but it actually reduces efficiency. From the above two landing angles, if you evaluate according to different roles, you will find that the intelligence of the current model is insufficient.
This user perspective can also be simplified: replacing japan cell number people and past programs is the most intuitive value of I, and every user needs it. The first step to replace people is to consider which roles can be covered. The main progress now is to make excellent people even better and replace other people. (i) A further step is to completely replace a certain role I and operate independently without human intervention. (i) Taking a company as an example, it is roughly like this: The first step to replace the program is to schedule other software products like that with the role of people as the center.
The second step is to fold out the redundant I, account current product. If you think this is difficult to understand, you can imagine how many parts of the system are actually repeated because of the artificial division caused by different suppliers and different roles. You must know that these divisions are just because the division of labor is like this, which is a compromise with reality, but it actually reduces efficiency. From the above two landing angles, if you evaluate according to different roles, you will find that the intelligence of the current model is insufficient.