Basic features. Usually the most expensive ones but you can’t do without them
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2025 10:44 am
Kano Model
The Kano model is a bit similar to the MoSCoW method. All features can be split based on the four parameters:
Neutral features. Can be added but don’t make much difference in terms of value.
Performance. Work well for improving overall user experience and app performance.
Satisfaction. Make your app attractive for users and add a competitive advantage.
Effort and Impact
This MVP feature prioritization approach is also called value and complexity and helps you determine how much effort you’ll put into development and how much value you’ll get in the long run. You can draw the matrix with impact and effort axes and sort the features according to the priorities:
Fill-ins
Quick wins
Reconsider
Major Projects
User Story Mapping
Likely the most popular method of figuring out what functionality to implement first in your MVP application. It involves visualizing how users will interact with the app, what they will need the most, and what actions they will take. It usually czech republic mobile database starts with defining a goal for users and then creating an entire map of their journey across the app.
Feature Priority Matrix
This one is again quite resembling the MoSCoW technique, yet it has its distinctions. First, you rate the features based on effort, impact, and risks. Then you divide them in accordance with four criteria:
Must-Have
Can-be-Done
Nice-to-Have
Waste-of-Time
Next Steps
In the format of most mobile app development companies, sorting the subsequent set of deliverables into themes is the next step after a strong definition of your product path. These themes are groups of related features and initiatives that help the user accomplish a specific task.
The Kano model is a bit similar to the MoSCoW method. All features can be split based on the four parameters:
Neutral features. Can be added but don’t make much difference in terms of value.
Performance. Work well for improving overall user experience and app performance.
Satisfaction. Make your app attractive for users and add a competitive advantage.
Effort and Impact
This MVP feature prioritization approach is also called value and complexity and helps you determine how much effort you’ll put into development and how much value you’ll get in the long run. You can draw the matrix with impact and effort axes and sort the features according to the priorities:
Fill-ins
Quick wins
Reconsider
Major Projects
User Story Mapping
Likely the most popular method of figuring out what functionality to implement first in your MVP application. It involves visualizing how users will interact with the app, what they will need the most, and what actions they will take. It usually czech republic mobile database starts with defining a goal for users and then creating an entire map of their journey across the app.
Feature Priority Matrix
This one is again quite resembling the MoSCoW technique, yet it has its distinctions. First, you rate the features based on effort, impact, and risks. Then you divide them in accordance with four criteria:
Must-Have
Can-be-Done
Nice-to-Have
Waste-of-Time
Next Steps
In the format of most mobile app development companies, sorting the subsequent set of deliverables into themes is the next step after a strong definition of your product path. These themes are groups of related features and initiatives that help the user accomplish a specific task.